keep/INTEGRATION.md

# Incorporating keep into an existing deploy setup

Concrete, by deploy *pattern* rather than by naming specific projects —
the shape of the fit depends on how a project currently gets its config
onto a target machine, not on what the project is.

## The general shape

Wherever a deploy script or a manually-maintained `.env` exists today, the
change is the same: replace "assume `.env` is already sitting there,
hand-copied at some point" with a `keep pull` at the top of the script.

```bash
# before — a deploy script assumes .env already exists on this machine
set -euo pipefail
source .env   # or docker-compose reads it directly

# after
set -euo pipefail
keep pull <project>/<env> --out .env
```

The one-time setup cost per machine: `keep identity init` once, send the
printed public key to whoever runs `keep recipient add`, then
`keep identity set-id <id>` with what comes back. After that, every future
deploy from that machine just works — no more "wait, what's the DB
password again" when setting up a new box.

A deploy identity should almost always be granted **read-only** access
(`keep grant <vault> <deploy-recipient-id> --read-only`) — it only ever
needs to `pull`, and a read-only grant means a compromised deploy box
can't also rotate the vault or add itself more recipients.

## Getting the `keep` CLI onto a machine

Chicken-and-egg: every pattern below assumes `keep` is already a runnable
command on the machine doing the pulling. Two ways to get there, pick
based on whether you're fine with a git checkout existing on that
machine:

**A machine you're already developing on, or don't mind cloning onto**
(your laptop, a VPS you administer directly):

```bash
git clone <this repo>
cd keep
npm install
./scripts/install-cli.sh   # builds, symlinks dist/cli/index.js onto PATH as `keep`
```

Symlinked rather than copied — a future `git pull && npm run build` is
the entire upgrade story, no need to re-run the install script.

**A deploy target you'd rather not clone a git repo onto** — bundle the
CLI and ship it over SSH, the same way flit/waste-go's `deploy-*.sh`
scripts ship a compiled binary:

```bash
HOST=user@your-vps ./deploy-cli.sh
```

Not quite a single file: the bundle itself (esbuild, ~18kb) covers
everything except `libsodium-wrappers`, which ships alongside it as the
real, unmodified package (~1.6MB total with its own dependency,
`libsodium`) rather than being force-inlined. That package's published
ESM build follows a broken relative import (see `src/shared/crypto.ts`'s
own comment on this), and statically inlining it via esbuild — technically
possible by routing through a literal `require()` call instead of
`import` — breaks its WASM engine's own Node-crypto feature detection at
runtime ("No secure random number generator found"), confirmed by
testing, not assumed. Shipping the real package is more reliable than
fighting that.

The script tars `dist-bundle/` (the esbuild output plus that one
dependency) and extracts it to `~/.keep-cli/` on the target over SSH,
then symlinks `~/bin/keep` to the entry point inside it — no git, no npm
install on that machine at all, just a `node` runtime (already there, if
it's running any of the other Node-based projects in this family). Re-run
it any time the CLI changes; safe to overwrite.

## Pattern: several docker-compose projects on one or more VPSes

The common shape once more than one or two projects are on `keep`:
each project lives in its own directory on the VPS
(`/opt/docker/<project>/docker-compose.yml`), and "deploy" means pulling
that project's env and running `docker compose up -d` in its directory.
`scripts/deploy.sh` in this repo is a small generic wrapper for exactly
that:

```bash
./deploy.sh myapp              # pulls myapp/production, runs compose in /opt/docker/myapp
./deploy.sh myapp staging      # pulls myapp/staging instead
DEPLOY_ROOT=/srv/apps ./deploy.sh myapp   # different project root
```

One-time setup per VPS: `keep identity init` on that machine, register
its public key with `keep recipient add`, `keep identity set-id`, then
grant it **read-only** access to each project vault it deploys
(`keep grant <project>/production <vps-recipient-id> --read-only`). After
that, `./deploy.sh <project>` is the whole deploy step — no `.env`
hand-copied onto the box first.

For "which machine can deploy which project," `keep overview` (admin)
prints every vault and every recipient's access in one screen — the
thing to reach for instead of checking each vault's grants one at a
time.

## Pattern: docker-compose reading a local `.env`

A common shape — `docker compose up -d` reads `environment:` values from
a `.env` file sitting next to `docker-compose.yml` on the deploy machine,
hand-maintained and containing real secrets.

```bash
keep pull myapp/production --out .env
docker compose up -d
```

No code changes needed in the target project — `keep` only changes *how
the `.env` file gets there*, not what reads it. This is the easiest
category to retrofit.

## Pattern: cross-compile + scp + SSH-restart deploy scripts

A shape where a deploy script builds a binary locally, ships it to a VPS,
and restarts a service over SSH — reading a local `.env` next to the
script for things like shared secrets that shouldn't be hardcoded or
re-typed on every invocation.

```bash
keep pull myapp/production --out .env
set -a && source .env && set +a
# ...rest of the deploy script unchanged
```

Same retrofit as the docker-compose case, just applied before whatever
build/ship step already exists.

## Pattern: a plaintext config file served to a browser

Not every `config.js`/similar file that *looks* like environment config
actually holds secrets — some of it is public-by-design (an API base URL,
a feature flag) that's explicitly meant to be visible to anyone loading
the page. `keep` solves a confidentiality problem; a file with nothing
confidential in it doesn't have one. Worth checking this distinction
before wiring `keep` into anything — retrofitting a non-secret config
file would be solving a problem that file doesn't have.

## A vault server's own configuration

Whatever runs `keep` itself needs its own `ADMIN_PASSWORD` to be a real,
manually-set secret on its own host — it can't bootstrap its own trust
root by pulling itself from itself. This is the same "root of trust
starts somewhere unmanaged" fact every secrets system has (Vault's own
unseal keys aren't stored in Vault either). Not a gap, just worth being
explicit about: `keep`'s own deploy stays on a plain `.env`/
`docker-compose.yml` environment variables.

## New projects going forward

The actual best use case isn't retrofitting existing deploys — it's never
having the "hand-reconstruct a `.env` from memory" moment for a *new*
deploy target in the first place. For whatever gets built next: register
its production host as a `keep` recipient as part of first setup, write
the deploy script to `keep pull` from day one, and the annoyance this was
built to fix never has a chance to happen.