Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
# keep
A self-hosted, end-to-end encrypted secrets store for deploy scripts.
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
`keep pull myapp/production` gets you a `.env` -shaped bundle of secrets,
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
decrypted locally — the server never sees plaintext values, and never
sees the key that would let it.
2026-07-12 19:56:59 +02:00

`keep` has no web UI by design — it's API + CLI only, so there's nothing
server-side to show beyond the terminal above.
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
## Why
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
Across a small family of self-hosted projects, every repo tends to have
its own `.env` /`.env.example` pair, and every one of those `.env` files
exists today by being hand-copied onto whatever machine needs it. That's
a real, already-felt annoyance, not a hypothetical one:
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
- Rotating a credential means finding and updating every machine that has
a copy, by hand.
- There's no record of which machine has which secret, or when it was
last updated.
- Onboarding a new deploy target means manually reconstructing a `.env`
from memory, a password manager note, or asking "hey, what's the value
for X."
`keep` is a small always-on service that holds encrypted secret bundles
and lets authorized machines/people pull them, decrypted locally, without
ever exposing plaintext to the server in between.
## What it isn't
- **Not Vault or Doppler.** Those are the established, heavier answers —
full policy engines, dynamic secrets, enterprise everything. `keep` is
the "already-solved problem, but self-hosted and scoped to what this
actually needs" answer, closer in spirit to `age` /`sops` (multi-recipient
encrypted files) than to a full secrets-management platform.
- **Not a static encrypted file committed to git**, which is what
`age` /`sops` typically produce. `keep` exists specifically for the two
things a committed encrypted file can't give you without re-running a
tool and re-committing: **live rotation ** (push once, everyone with
access can pull the update) and **an access log ** (who/what actually
fetched a secret bundle, and when — a git history shows content
changes, not access).
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
- **Not an ephemeral file-drop tool.** Something built for single-retrieval,
self-destructing file sharing is the opposite of what a secret needs to
be — a deploy script needs to fetch the same bundle on every deploy, not
once and then have it vanish.
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
## Core model
Adapts the pattern `age` /`sops` /PGP already use for multi-recipient
encrypted files — a symmetric key encrypts the actual payload, and that
symmetric key is separately "wrapped" (encrypted) once per authorized
recipient's public key — into a live service instead of a static file:
1. Each client (a developer's machine, a deploy script running on a VPS)
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
has its own Ed25519/X25519 keypair.
2. A vault (`myapp/production` , `myapp/staging` , whatever key) holds one
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
encrypted blob — the actual secret bundle, encrypted under a random
symmetric key.
3. That symmetric key is wrapped separately for every recipient granted
access to that vault. The server stores N small wrapped-key blobs, one
per recipient, alongside the one encrypted payload.
4. `keep pull <vault>` fetches the payload plus this identity's wrapped
key, unwraps locally with the private key, decrypts, and prints (or
writes) the `.env` -shaped result.
5. Revoking a recipient's access is deleting their one wrapped-key row —
the payload and every other recipient's access are untouched.
6. Rotating a secret is `keep push <vault>` again — a new random
symmetric key, re-wrapped for every currently-granted recipient. Cheap,
2026-07-12 19:54:45 +02:00
since the recipient list rarely changes. By default the outgoing
version is kept as a one-step rollback safety net (`keep pull
--previous`); ` keep push --purge` skips that for compromise-driven
rotations where the old value should stop being retrievable, full stop.
7. Grants distinguish read from write — a recipient can be given
read-only access (`keep grant --read-only` ), which can pull a vault
but can't push to it or grant others access.
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
Full design — data model, the atomic-grant/revoke details, and what this
explicitly does and doesn't protect against — is in
[IMPLEMENTATION.md ](./IMPLEMENTATION.md ). Ideas for wiring this into
existing deploy scripts are in [INTEGRATION.md ](./INTEGRATION.md ).
## Quickstart
```bash
# 1. Run the server (see "Docker" below for a real deploy)
cp .env.example .env
npm install
npm run dev:server
# 2. Each machine/person that needs access generates its own identity
npm run cli -- identity init
# → prints a public key
# 3. An admin registers that public key as a recipient
KEEP_ADMIN_PASSWORD=... npm run cli -- recipient add --label "my-laptop" --pubkey <hex>
# → prints a recipient id
# 4. The machine that generated the identity records its assigned id
npm run cli -- identity set-id <recipient-id>
# 5. Push a vault — the pusher is automatically its first recipient
npm run cli -- push myapp/production --file .env.production
# 6. Anyone else with a grant can pull it, decrypted, ready to use
npm run cli -- pull myapp/production > .env
```
## Granting, revoking, rotating
```bash
# An existing recipient of a vault can grant a NEW recipient access,
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
# without needing admin rights or re-encrypting the payload. Read access
# by default — add --read-only for a recipient that should only ever
# pull, never push (e.g. an automated deploy identity):
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
keep grant myapp/production <new-recipient-id>
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
keep grant myapp/production <deploy-recipient-id> --read-only
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
# Revoking is an admin operation — pure metadata deletion, immediate:
KEEP_ADMIN_PASSWORD=... keep revoke myapp/production <recipient-id>
# Revoke only stops FUTURE pulls. If this was a compromise response,
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
# rotate AND purge — --purge skips retaining the outgoing version as a
# rollback, since the whole point of rotating for a leak is that the old
# value stops being retrievable by anyone:
keep push myapp/production --file .env.production --purge
# A routine push (no compromise involved) keeps the outgoing version as
# a one-step rollback safety net:
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
keep push myapp/production --file .env.production
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
keep pull myapp/production --previous # "oops, undo that last push"
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
# See who's touched a vault and when:
keep log myapp/production
```
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
Pushing to an existing vault requires a * write * grant — a read-only
recipient can pull but can't push or grant others access. A brand-new
vault's first push is always read-write for the pusher.
2026-07-12 21:12:55 +02:00
## Announcing deploys
`keep` can also relay a small "there's a new image" signal alongside a
vault, so CI never needs standing SSH access to a deploy target — CI
announces a tag, and whatever already redeploys that box locally polls
for it instead of being reached into from outside:
```bash
# CI, after a successful build/push — any grant is enough, read-only included:
keep announce myapp/production --tag <short-sha>
# The deploy target polls for a change and prints it:
keep watch myapp/production --interval 60
```
An announced tag isn't a secret — it lives outside the encrypted vault
payload, in its own small table, and is visible to the server (same as
vault names and access timestamps already are). `keep` never pulls or
runs the announced image itself; it only relays the string. See
[IMPLEMENTATION.md ](./IMPLEMENTATION.md ) for how this fits into a bulk
deploy script with a no-`keep` fallback for projects not yet bootstrapped
onto it.
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
## Docker
```bash
docker compose up -d
```
Uses the image from `IMAGE` in `.env` . For a local build:
```bash
docker build -t keep:local .
IMAGE=keep:local docker compose up -d
```
## CI/CD
Gitea Actions workflow at `.gitea/workflows/docker.yml` . Builds and
pushes to the Gitea container registry on every push to `main` . Requires
a `TKNTKN` secret (PAT with `packages:write` ) in the repo settings.
## Environment variables
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `PORT` | `3050` | Port to listen on |
| `DATA_DIR` | `./data` | Where the SQLite DB (vaults, recipients, grants) lives |
| `ADMIN_PASSWORD` | — | Gates recipient add/remove and revoke. Unset disables `/api/admin/*` (503) — push/pull/grant for already-registered recipients keep working |
| `REQUEST_MAX_SKEW_SECONDS` | `300` | Replay-protection window for signed CLI requests |
CLI-side: `KEEP_SERVER_URL` (default `http://localhost:3050` ),
`KEEP_ADMIN_PASSWORD` (for admin commands: `recipient add/list/remove` ,
`revoke` ).
Initial design: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
README covers the pitch and how this differs from Vault/Doppler (too
heavy) and a static age/sops-encrypted file in git (no live rotation,
no access log). IMPLEMENTATION covers the multi-recipient key-wrapping
scheme (age/sops-style, adapted to libsodium primitives already used
in flit/waste-go), the flat vault/recipient/grant/access-log schema,
rotation and revocation semantics (including the standard "revoke
doesn't retroactively unread already-decrypted secrets" caveat), CLI
surface, and deploy-script integration.
Motivated by a real, already-felt annoyance: every repo in this
project family (goonk, wisp, npm-statuspage, flit, waste-go) has its
own hand-copied .env today, with no rotation story and no record of
which machine has which secret.
No code yet — design stage. Admin auth mechanism flagged as needing a
decision before implementation starts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:02:08 +02:00
## Status
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
Implemented: identity, push/pull/grant/revoke/log, read/write grant
scoping, one-step rollback with an explicit purge mode for
2026-07-12 21:12:55 +02:00
compromise-driven rotations, admin recipient management, an admin
cross-vault `overview` , deploy-signal `announce` /`watch` , a
`scripts/deploy.sh` wrapper, and Docker deploy. Verified end-to-end —
two and three independent identities, read-only grants correctly
blocked from push/grant, grants preserved across rotation,
previous-version pull working and correctly wiped by `--purge` for
every recipient, a read-only identity successfully announcing while
still being logged, `watch` picking up an announced tag and exiting
nonzero for an unknown/ungranted vault, malformed-auth rejection —
against both a local server and the built Docker image. See
Resolve open design questions: write-scoped grants, rollback, purge
Per-question resolution, per best practice rather than deferral:
- Push authorization: closed the least-privilege gap where read implied
write. vault_grants gained can_write (default true, so nothing
existing changes); enforced on push and grant (granting others is
itself a mutation of vault membership, so it needs write too, not
just read). 'keep grant --read-only' creates a read-only grant.
- Version history: not full history (conflates "undo a typo'd push"
with "this leaked, stop retaining it" into one mechanism). Retains
exactly one previous version as a rollback safety net
(vaults.prev_ciphertext/prev_nonce + a vault_grants_previous mirror
table so recipients can unwrap it), plus 'keep push --purge' for
compromise-driven rotations that explicitly skips retention and
wipes any existing previous version too.
- Per-secret-key granularity: resolved by NOT building it — documented
the escape hatch (split into more vaults) instead of adding partial-
decrypt complexity for a problem the existing primitive solves.
One more real bug caught during verification: the CLI's --previous flag
initially signed a path including its query string, but the server
verifies against req.originalUrl with the query stripped — a mismatch
that would have made every --previous request fail signature
verification. Fixed by splitting the signed path from the request URL
in signedFetch, signing only the former.
Verified end-to-end with three independent identities: read-only grant
correctly blocked from push and from granting others, write access and
read-only status both preserved correctly across a rotation, previous-
version pull working for a routine push and correctly unavailable to
every recipient after a purge push. Also re-verified against a fresh
Docker build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:50:08 +02:00
[IMPLEMENTATION.md ](./IMPLEMENTATION.md ) for the full design and its
resolved decisions (per-secret-key granularity deliberately not built —
use multiple vaults instead).
Implement keep: self-hosted E2E encrypted secrets sync
Server: Express + better-sqlite3 (WAL), multi-recipient key-wrapping
per IMPLEMENTATION.md's design — vaults/recipients/vault_grants/
access_log. Two auth paths: ADMIN_PASSWORD header for recipient
management and revoke (pure metadata operations), signed-request
auth (Ed25519 signature over method+path+timestamp+body-hash) for
push/pull/grant, mirroring the spirit of this project family's other
signed-handshake patterns without naming them.
CLI: identity init/show/set-id, push/pull/grant/log, admin recipient
add/list/remove and revoke. Grant is a client-side crypto operation
(the granter unwraps the vault's current key locally and reseals it
for the new recipient) rather than a server-side operation, since the
server never holds an unwrapped key to grant with.
Verified end-to-end with two independent local identities against a
live server and separately against the built Docker image: register,
push, pull (granted and ungranted), grant without re-pushing, admin
revoke, a subsequent rotation confirming the revoked recipient stays
excluded, and rejection of missing/malformed signed-request auth.
Two real bugs caught during verification, not just written up:
- libsodium-wrappers' published ESM build does a relative import only
resolvable under bundler-style resolution — broken under plain Node
ESM. Fixed via createRequire to force the CJS build.
- Express's req.path inside a sub-router is relative to the mount
point, which would have silently mismatched a client signing the
full request path. Fixed by verifying against req.originalUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-12 19:38:24 +02:00
## License
MIT. See [LICENSE ](./LICENSE ).